Critical evaluation

Three years ago somebody suggested me to do an MA, around that time I had many ideas about my practice but I did not have a clear idea to give to others when they asked about my theme or my subject, thanks to my MA, now I know that it is all about the depiction of my visual experience of reality.

Both Francis Bacon and David Hockney helped me in the process of understanding my practice; I was captivated by Bacon’s views on the horror of life, the way he approached the figure and his spatial arrangements. Hockney helped me to question linear perspective and monocular depictive systems, I was also impressed by his views on how time flows between images.

Now I know that through my practice, I have been trying to push the limits set by the flatness. Using images to create 3D models has allowed me to reflect about the substance of images, and has also helped me to gain enough confidence to start sculpting again.

I think that I have developed both my digital and physical professional skills, the creation of META-IMAGES is a quite interesting path that I want to follow, I have learned a lot from the making of my final piece and I plan to use that knowledge for the making of hybrid pieces that might inhabit the viewers space.

Doing my first VR piece allowed me to explore an unknown territory, digital images have been always part of my practice but were never present in the final piece, making the VR roller coaster encouraged me to keep doing digital explorations without the need of painting anything. Creating and editing digital images has also helped me to understand that my practice goes beyond paint and brushes (Although I quite like those two).

I plan to keep learning about VR user interface creation. I also plan to explore projection mapping as it might allow me to present my digital creations over not-flat surfaces as I think this could allow me to create an immersive space without the VR headset.

I am quite interested in the moving image and also the process moving through the image, I already started to do experiments with a MOVING-META-IMAGE using the same principles I use for still images.

Reading a book titled “The power of the centre” by Rudolf Arnheim, has helped me to learn more about spatial composition, I see META-IMAGES as both a 3D object and a place for the viewer to visit, my plan is to read more about architecture and spatial composition.

This experience has also made change my expectations about the art world, now I know I will need to keep exploring options in order to continue developing my practice whilst making money to pay the bills. I also understood the importance of networking and collaboration, in my near future I plan to work with a sound artist to explore how sound might spread through the META-IMAGE.

Finally, I will say that I used to ask myself about the What, Where, When and the How of my pieces, now, I am aware that thanks to my MA, I learned to ask Why.

 

Light and space

The experience of setting up my final exhibition has been both fun and challenging, after spending more than 4 months focusing on my final piece now I have to split my mind in order to deal with all the details of the exhibition whilst working on the last details of my piece.

I feel pretty lucky because I was given a great space, however, this does not mean that everything is perfect, my biggest challenge so far has been setting up a proper lighting system for the two components of my piece, on this matter, I have to say that for the first time I feel that light has become a very important asset, I guess that in the past, things were simpler because the process of  lighting walls tends to follow more or less the same formula, but setting up a piece in the middle of the space is quite a different matter.

Thanks to Jonathan I also learned that you have to balance elements to get them to work together and you have to be very careful because each new element like a light, a plinth, a shadow could become either part of the piece or worst; a distraction.

Thinking back about my previous exhibitions, I concluded that as a painter, my concerns were limited to very specific matters regarding walls and circulation, and this might be an inherent advantage for flat pieces that are supposed to be hanged on a wall, however, my role as a painter/sculptor working in both physical and digital environments brings new challenges and this will change forever the way I present my work not only in a physical space but also in the way I present it through my web page, social media and even for competitions and exhibition proposals.

A META-IMAGE maker

Last week I was working on a presentation for SIREN Conference, at the same time I was making the video for the MA`s Symposium, it was a very difficult but interesting week, I even had to work on the train going to and back from Edinburgh.

Thanks to all the reflection I had to do about my practice, I ended up understanding how important images are in my life; I realised that since I was a kid, I used images to express my feelings and thoughts, and this is also the main reason for me to become a painter.

Although this might seem pretty obvious, it has helped me solve a puzzle that I had had for a long time, especially since I started expanding my practice by using digital photographs as part of a final piece.

As a painter, I keep questioning myself about digital images because using them as part of a final piece, feels like going in an opposite direction from painting, I do not consider myself a photographer as I do not want to depict the physical world through a lens, although I feel that, digital images provide unlimited raw material to work on.

Since last year, I realised that I am also a sculptor, but my interest in 3D shapes is directly linked to the image, and at one point, I realised that painting and sculpting are actually part of the process of making a META-IMAGE.

For most of my artistic practice, I have used photographic images as reference for my paintings, however, since last year, and thanks to my “Camberwell Roller Coaster” piece; a digital piece out of 12 photographs I made whilst walking through Camberwell College, my interest in them grew and now I feel that I have to keep exploring this path and take the risk of making more digital pieces.

 

 

The SIREN experience

Last Tuesday I went to Edinburgh in the company of Cèline and Jonathan, we were presenting a paper on the SIREN Conference, I have to say that this was an amazing experience that allowed me to look inside the PHD world, I was able to attend several talks by people from very different backgrounds.

By doing my presentation, I was able to go back and take a look on the whole of my practice, even back when I started to make complex arrangements, like the one for “little tragedy”.

This exercise allowed me to understand a very basic fact about myself; images have played a very important role in the way I express my ideas, although this might seem quite obvious, it has helped me to understand why I do what I do.

I AM AN IMAGE MAKER.

Wimbledon Residence

On April 2017 I was invited by Artist/Reader Jennet Thomas to do a 5-week residence at Wimbledon College of Arts, so, from April 19th until May 18th and for two days a week, I had the opportunity to set up a VR camp in the middle of the Print and Time-Based Media (PTBM) Studio, a big and well-illuminated room located on the second floor of the College’s intelligent building.

My plan was to display and allow students to experience a VR piece that I had already presented at the Tate Exchange event; Landscape #12. My goal was to connect with students in order to have meaningful conversations about VR technology and other related topics like 3D modelling and 3D animation.

During the residence, I had the opportunity to talk and share ideas with more than 10 students and 5 members of staff.

As a practitioner, I think this was a wonderful opportunity to talk to others about my practice and reflect about all the process of delivering a VR piece to the public. As a student, I enjoyed the opportunity to inhabit a different studio and to talk to students with different practices, I especially enjoyed the opportunity to meet BA students as I felt that they have a fresher look on things and are still quite open to new ideas. I believe that this kind of exercises provide a unique opportunity to create connections with peers and have meaningful cross-disciplinary conversations, I really think that this should be happening more often around UAL.

Photogrammetry 2.0 – 360 ways to go wrong

When I started using photogrammetry, a year ago, I did understand that 3D models made with it are far from perfect, however, at that moment I managed to take advantage of this to create a weird character for the collaboration I did with Jennet Thomas.

At the beginning of this year, I decided that I was going to use this technique again to create a piece for my final show. It made sense as I wanted to create an accurate 3D model from my landscape#13 piece. Since then, I had spent quite a good amount of time making/fixing the 3D model and this has made me also wonder about the challenges inherent to this technique:

180 Vs 360 degrees

One of the first things that I learned is that making 180 degrees single-sided pieces is a lot easier than making 360 degrees double-sided ones. Illumination becomes a nightmare and it is really difficult to get shots from 360 degrees inside my MA studio. I did try to hang the model from above but this did not work thanks to the micro wind currents so at the end I had to change my approach and decided to make chunks instead of a whole piece.

Uneven quality

Another thing I learned from this project is that a number of photos you take on a particular region will affect both the density of the mesh and the quality of the texture,  this becomes particularly relevant when you are making a 360 object as you might get fewer visual references in comparison with flat-shaped pieces like my landscape#12. Stitching up nightmare

Stitching and photoshopping

After creating all the 3D chunks, I imported them into Blender software. I discovered that all spatial references were gone and both the orientation and the scale of the objects was off. After arranging all the chunks I discovered that the lighting around the joining areas was uneven and after doing most of the stitching I felt that the end result wasn’t good enough. I thought that the best way to fix this would be using photoshop in order to fix the textures but this ended up being an impossible task as the whole texture of every chunk is actually a collage of 20 different and overlapping images. AT THIS POINT I WANTED TO KILL MYSELF!!!

Merging textures and reshaping UVs

Finally, after doing a lot of research I discovered that there is a procedure that allows you to bake all different textures into a single one, but before I made this, I had also to figure out how to change the existent UV layout in order to get decent size islands that I might be able to edit in Photoshop. FINALLY, I SEE THE LIGHT!

My reflection

After 3 months trying to sort this out, I feel that finally, I’ve found a workflow that will allow me to produce bigger and more complex pieces. I feel that this process has forced me to change my approach several times and that the limitations/restrictions of this particular technology had had a great impact in the way I plan to make new work, I keep thinking about digital as a medium, I really feel that the way photogrammetry works will have a direct impact on how I create my future pieces.

 

 

Immersive reflection – A VR sketchbook

A couple of weeks ago I started building this VR piece for an Academic Support event that will be held on the 11th of May, at the beginning I felt that it was kind of silly to make a sketchbook using VR, after all, it takes a lot of time without and it does not feel like a practical thing to do.

I have to say that after a while I felt that this exercise allowed me to refresh my memory around my practice as I had to go back to look at very old posts, I also felt that it was quite nice to walk around old and recent thoughts although I have to say that I did focus on just one of my projects in order to keep this task simple.

At the moment I feel that I need to spend more time wandering around this space as I have spent most of the time working on it and sorting little challenges like playing a video and replacing one of the VIVE controllers with a flashlight (something I wanted to do for a long time).

I really think that VR allows you to observe your notes from a quite unique perspective and now I am thinking about expanding this little work to include other projects.

Inside the cave – Revisiting the painting

Last week I was able to make a video render of the digital model from my landscape #13 piece. As a final touch, I added a soundtrack by Wagner called “Die Walküre”, I selected this musical background because I wanted to make a connection to a piece called “Der Riese”, a video made by artist Michael Klier. In this piece, Michael used the footage from an airport’s surveillance camera and by adding the sound, he created a narrative that was not meant to exist in the original material.

I am quite pleased with the end result. As a painter, it is quite interesting to me to be able to explore a piece from within and I feel this is really changing and expanding my approach to painting and sculpting and now I am trying to reflect on all the things I am subverting within my practice.

The active viewer

By escaping flatness, the image folds and grows on itself, so the gaze of the viewer is challenged by not being able to see everything from a set point of view, at this point, I am aware that not every viewer feels comfortable about this challenge but I also know that this opens a whole bunch of possibilities for the viewer to interact with the piece.

The evolving image

Painting sometimes becomes boring, I have to say that more than one time in the past, I have felt that the piece I was working on, became so familiar, that working on it was as enjoyable as brushing my teeth. Since I started working on 3D paintings, especially on the standalone ones, I feel that I am constantly challenged by them, not only from a technical point of view but also from a perceptual point of view, and I feel that, by not being able to see all the image at once, it keeps changing.

Shaping accident

Although I knew that using a sculpture as a canvas was a way to challenge my practice as I needed to constantly adapt due to changes in light and terrain, I was not able to imagine how the piece would actually look from within, I guess I was not aware of how it might actually mutate once I added the artificial lighting, changed the scale and added a floating point of view. Another thing I also discovered is that I could potentially intervene bot

Controlling the gaze

By using a camera that runs through a path, and then rendering a video, I am partially controlling the way the piece is looked at. Of course, one could argue that the viewer is now looking at a video rather than looking at a painting, however, I think that by being confronted with the physical sculpture, both elements become strongly bonded inside the viewer’s mind.

In the VR piece, more control is given to the viewer as he/her is able to move his/her head in any desired direction, however, I still have control over the path that the viewer is following.

Seeing with rhythm

For many years I wanted to add sound to my pieces, although I am not creating it at the moment, I am quite pleased to use this magnificent soundtrack, I believe that this adds a new layer to the piece and allows me to increase the dramatic effect obtained with the flashlight-like lighting.

Things to try in the future

  • Make an early 3D model or even playing with the concept of two different layers of paint, one will only be visible from within and the other one will be only visible from outside.
  • Create restricted access areas, forcing the viewer to look from a distance or even prevent him/her from seeing some parts from within or outside the piece.
  • Plan how the camera could potentially move following different paths.

Open call for Anxiety

This blog post is very personal, although it is connected to my practice (I guess everything in my life is), this is my reflection about something that has been affecting me on a personal level; my ever-growing list of artistic opportunities.

This Easter was a nightmare for me as I discovered that I was trying to “bite more than I could chew” and funny enough I was not even able to submit my proposal to just one of the competitions.

I remember a similar time when I decided to create a whole set of pieces for an exhibition in NYC in 20 days, it all started when somebody I knew offered me the opportunity to exhibit there and I decided to turn a holiday break into a nightmare. At the end, it went well… kind of… I did not sell anything and also ruined the trip for me and my girlfriend as we did not even visit Central Park!!!.

I have been like through all my artistic career, I remember that on one year I applied for more than 20 opportunities and was involved in more than 6 exhibitions.

It is a marathon, not a sprint…

A couple of weeks ago I saw an interview with artist Grayson Perry and he advised that artists should think always compare their career to a marathon rather than a sprint. This analogy was perfect for me, especially because since the beginning of this year, I have been feeling tired and more than inclined to make changes in the way I am pushing myself.

Although I have been trying to pay attention only to opportunities that truly connect with my practice, I did not set any kind of rules regarding whether I decide to take part or just let it slip away.

I guess it has always been hard for me to draw my limits. I tend to say yes a lot (as Jennet pointed out) and I am really bad when estimating the amount of effort that a project will actually involve. I even remember that a close friend told me that I always set unrealistic personal goals… maybe it is time to start listening.

A set of rules

I really feel that I need to change my strategy in order to cope wit my practice in the long term. So, whilst holding hands with the spirit of change, I declare that from now on:

-I will only deal with a maximum of two applications per month.

-I will never make new work for an application, I will only push myself to finish work that is already in process.

-I will give myself at least one week to review CV, BIO and STATEMENT.

-I will give myself at least 3 days to take proper pictures and/or document the work I am submitting.

I will never spend more than £40 for competition fees.